tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sun Jan 28 11:14:38 1996
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: KLBC> Mixed Nits
- From: [email protected] (Alan Anderson)
- Subject: Re: KLBC> Mixed Nits
- Date: Sun, 28 Jan 1996 14:32:33 -0600
David Wood writes:
>And as for no canon usage of "nuq" as a verb, consider that there aren't
>many causes or reasons to use it that way. One sentence comes to mind: "Who
>here is not a Klingon?" And if "nuq" isn't usable as a verb, then I have no
>idea how to translate that, except as "naDevDaq tlhIngan nuqbe'?"
tlhInganpu'vaD <nuq> jatlhbe'lu'bej. <'Iv> jatlhlu'.
>/* Whine ON
>FWIW: I couldn't find verbs for "important," "significant," or "relevant"
>which
>I could reverse with Ha'. The above phrase works much better, but I would
>still
>like to have the others when I need them.
>Whine OFF */
Check the addendum for another meaning of {potlh}. But why would you want
to say {potlhHa'}? Is there something wrong with {ram}?
-- ghunchu'wI' batlh Suvchugh vaj batlh SovchoH vaj