tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Jan 11 10:50:38 1996
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: cha'logh jImeQ
- From: [email protected] ( "c.j.atherton-cj")
- Subject: Re: cha'logh jImeQ
- Date: Thu, 11 Jan 1996 18:49:31 +0000 (GMT)
majQa'!
I read Guido's rant about use of -taH vs. use of -lI, then I read
charghwI's retort. By the end, I had it all nice and clear in my head.
Without wanting to take sides (something I hate), I have to say that
charghwI's explanation makes more intuitive sense to me.
SuSuvtaHjaj, 'ach bochaw' Sabej vIneH. SuSuvtaHvIS jIghojtaHvIS. {{:-)
vanya (faking a Klingon smilie for all that she's Bajoran).
--
************************************************************************
Chris Atherton
[email protected]
"OOoooooeeeeeEEEE eeeeoo? Ooo oooee EE
eeoooo". - Tiny Clanger.
************************************************************************