tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sun Dec 15 21:36:06 1996
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: jItlhob Hoch
- From: Michiel Uitdehaag (Saito) <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: jItlhob Hoch
- Date: Mon, 16 Dec 1996 14:39:46 +0900
>such. However, it should probably be spelled *Sarq* or *SarQ*, and
>pronounced *shark*, or *sharkh* more or less.
The -rQ- or -rq- combination is not legitimate, is it?
I would guess Sark to transliterate as {SarIq}
jej