tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Dec 11 06:11:53 1996
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
RE: story, part 4
- From: DaQtIq HoD <[email protected]>
- Subject: RE: story, part 4
- Date: Wed, 11 Dec 1996 09:14:56 -0500
>I generally don't feel the need to discuss story content, but in this instance
>I would like to. You objected to Velka telling her father she loved him. I
>understand why you said that. Do you think that the father's actions are
>enough and that words are not needed? May I suggest the following:
>
>rInDI' vav, tlhup velqa, "qatlho', vavoy."
>"SaSaH, puqbe'pu'oy," jang vavchaj, "qaStaHvIS ram pa'Daq peQong."
>
>Still too much? I could lose the {SaSaH}. Do the {oy}'s have to go too?
I think the <-oy>'s are enough to convey the affection felt.
Maybe DareS would reply: <tlhIHmo' jIHemqu', puqbe'oypu'> or <muquvmoH ta'raj,
puqbe'oypu'>
lutlIj vItIvqu'taH. nom yIqon! jItuvHa'. ;)
- DaQtIq