tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Dec 09 15:42:45 1996
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: spammers
I know this is off topic, mostly, but I just had a question.
Has anybody contacted this spammer's ISP about his/her very distasteful and
improper nettiquite? If not, please do so. I get tlhIngan-Hol on digest mode,
so it's hard to have to scroll past seventeen messages that do nothing but get
him/her less of a chance to get off. To give an example: If I wanlked up to
someone and called them a "foul" name, prhaps punching them simultaneously,
could I possibly expect them to do me any favors? I'm afraid I don't know
how to contact his/her ISP, or I would have done it myself long ago. Last time
I checked, public lewdness (including the 'net) was illegal. Especially verbal
abuse, I would think. Calling someone any of the terms described below is
totally inappropriate anywhere, I would think. If not, it will at least get
him out of our hair to email his provider.
> Date: Mon, 09 Dec 1996 00:17:58 -0800 (PST)
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: Multiple recipients of list <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: Question of botjan
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
>
> F*ck you, you sack of dog sh*t, go f*ck yourself up the *ss. It's not
> even my f*cking birthday, you pathetic loser. You have way too much time
> on your hands when your not jacking off b*tch. Don't ever write to me
> again, I don't associate with masturbating homosexuals. How lame can you
> be when you can't get some desperate fag to do you up the *ss.
Geez...how did you even get on this list if you hate it so much? A few choice
words spring to mind (yIntagh, petaQ, and most of all nuch'a'), but I'll
restrain myself! {{:-)
Anyway, as far as tlhIngan Hol... thanks for all of the people who cleared up
my syllable structure question. I wasn't thinking at the time, I suppose! For
the second time in three days, HIvqa' veqlargh!
-McReynolds