tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sun Dec 08 12:50:43 1996
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
RE: KLBC: name & title
- From: "David Trimboli" <[email protected]>
- Subject: RE: KLBC: name & title
- Date: Sun, 8 Dec 96 18:00:38 UT
December 07, 1996 12:41 AM, jatlh jo'Sqa:
> Well, I've finally chosen a name, and have integrated it into a
> modified .sig file. However, I'm wondering if I've used the correct
> syntax for Klingon. Translated into English, the syntax is fine, which is
> what worries me.
>
> Currently it sits as:
>
> <jo'Sqa, tlhIngan SuvwI'>
> jo'Sqa, Klingon warrior
>
> However, that seems suspect. I thought of <tlhIngan SuvwI' jo'Sqa>, but
> wasn't sure if that meant "jo'Sqa is a Klingon warrior" or if it was
> gibberish. What about <SuvwI' tlhIngan jo'Sqa>? (Is there a combination
> I *haven't* tried yet??)
The first one, {jo'Sqa, tlhIngan SuvwI'} is good. If this can be considered a
title or a rank, then the proper place for {tlhIngan SuvwI'} is *after* the
name.
--
SuStel
Beginners' Grammarian
Stardate 96938.4