tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Apr 24 17:29:05 1996

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: bang

• From: [email protected] (Alan Anderson)
• Subject: Re: bang
• Date: Wed, 24 Apr 1996 19:31:48 -0500

Qob writes:
>We now have canon for using {bang} without the {-wI'}: page 159 of TKW gives
>{reH bang larghpu'}, with {bang} translated as "love" or "one who is loved".

Pages 80 and 141 of The Klingon Dictionary also translate it this way. :-)

-- ghunchu'wI'               batlh Suvchugh vaj batlh SovchoH vaj

• Prev by Date: Re: Memory trick
• Next by Date: {lab} and {lI'} (was Re: Memory trick)
• Prev by thread: Re: bang
• Next by thread: bang
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level