tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Apr 05 21:32:51 1996

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: worn out (vavwI' loDnI')

• From: [email protected]
• Subject: Re: worn out (vavwI' loDnI')
• Date: Sat, 6 Apr 1996 00:32:19 -0500

In a message dated 96-04-05 21:09:06 EST, tIm wrote:

>nIQopmoHlaH taHqeqpu' 'e' yIchaw'Qo'.
>
>lugh 'e' jItul
>tIm
>(With my luck "to hope" won't take the 'e' construction)

It does.  But you got the prefix wrong.  {lugh 'e' vItul}.  I like the
sentence, though.

SuStel
Hovjaj 96263.4

• Prev by Date: lutwIj chu'
• Next by Date: Greetings
• Prev by thread: Re: Re: worn out (vavwI' loDnI')
• Next by thread: Re: Noun order? (Big mistake by me)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level