tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Oct 13 18:09:21 1995

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: HolQeD 4.3




On Fri, 13 Oct 1995, Mark E. Shoulson wrote:

> >Date: Fri, 13 Oct 1995 06:04:31 -0700
> >From: "R.B Franklin" <[email protected]>
> 
> >Can anyone confirm whether card S8 says {lIjaHbe'bogh} or {lIjtaHbe'bogh}?
> >(It makes a big difference in the translation.)
> 
> I think it should have been "lIjlaHbe'bogh vay'".  This would make a lot of
> sense, since it runs full in the face of the problem of having "-laH" and
> "-lu'" on the same verb.  So it's "Kahless, whom none can forget" (or "whom
> one cannot forget").  Had it been "-taH", Okrand would surely have used
> "-lu'".  Work for you?

Ahh, that makes sense.  I had wondered why the relative clause included 
{vay'} instead of simply using {-lu'}.

> ~mark

yoDtargh



Back to archive top level