tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Oct 13 07:38:49 1995

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: Straight from MO

• From: [email protected]
• Subject: Re: Straight from MO
• Date: Fri, 13 Oct 1995 09:38:17 -0500
• In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

 > The issue here is not canon Trek, but canon tlhIngan Hol . . . which is not
 > the same thing.  

I respectfully disagree.  Authorized source (P'mount), authorized content.

TKD contains the notion of variations (as clipped versus standard),
and the practice of changing "official" dialects on the ascension of a
new emperor.  This, IMHO, provides an "out" that excuses the execrable
tlhIngan we hear at times (or don't hear - most of the time, *I* can't
make out what they are saying, anyway, so I don't worry about it) as
variations Maltz hasn't told us about yet.  rejmorgh jIHbe'.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Straight from MO
    • From: "R.B Franklin" <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: Straight from MO
    • From: "Mark J. Reed" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: To be or not to be(How do you say this?)
• Next by Date: cha' bom
• Prev by thread: Re: Straight from MO
• Next by thread: Re: Straight from MO
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level