tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Nov 27 08:47:47 1995
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: qatlhbe'
- From: "Mark E. Shoulson" <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: qatlhbe'
- Date: Mon, 27 Nov 1995 11:47:42 -0500
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]> (message from JarnoPeschier on Sat, 25 Nov 1995 09:50:07 -0800)
>Date: Sat, 25 Nov 1995 09:50:07 -0800
>From: Jarno Peschier <[email protected]>
>At 11:23 21-11-95 -0800, you wrote:
>>On 21 Nov 95 at 6:22, c.j.atherton-cj wrote:
>>qatlhbe' {{:)
>Is this correct Klingon for "Why not?", along the same line that {nuqjatlh}
>is correct Klingon...?
Not a chance. I'd agree with peHruS that you'd need to state the whole
sentence with qatlh (e.g. qatlh wIjatlhbe'? why don't we say it?). I think
vanya was just poking fun at the idea of translating literally.
~mark