tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sun Nov 26 14:15:44 1995

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: "soup"



In a message dated 95-11-25 20:49:19 EST, you write:

>peHruS writes:
>>This gives {bIQDaq vutta'bogh targh}, not a complete sentence, but a
>>grammatically correct phrase.
>
>Grammatically correct, yes.  Conceptually correct?  Not quite.  This
>word order puts the targ as the SUBJECT here, and I do not think you
>really mean to referr to a (rather talented) targ which accomplishes
>cooking.  If you want the targ to be cooked, then {targh} must be the
>OBJECT of the verb {vut}.

HIvqa' veqlargh vIjach jay'
bIQDaq targh vutta'bogh Doch 'e' vIghItlhpu' 'e' vIHech
'ach rut nom vIghItlh 'ej QIt vIQub

mubaQmeH qatlho'

peHruS


Back to archive top level