tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Nov 20 22:13:41 1995

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: jIlIH(')egh, etc.

• From: [email protected]
• Subject: Re: jIlIH(')egh, etc.
• Date: Tue, 21 Nov 1995 01:13:09 -0500

In a message dated 95-11-15 07:03:00 EST, you write:

>ghIH 'Iw 'ej *sex-appeal* lughajbe' lomDu' 
>
>

Question from peHruS:

I've seen before {lommey}, not {lomDu'}.  Should the body part suffix be
affixed to corpses?

Looking forward to your answer.

peHruS

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: jIlIH(')egh, etc.
    • From: [email protected] ( "c.j.atherton-cj")
  • Re: jIlIH(')egh, etc.
    • From: "Mark E. Shoulson" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: DujHom chu' vIje'nIS
• Next by Date: Re: Calendar Ideas
• Prev by thread: Re: jIlIH(')egh, etc.
• Next by thread: Re: jIlIH(')egh, etc.
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level