tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Nov 16 19:08:58 1995

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: DujHom chu' vIje'nIS

• From: "R.B Franklin" <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: DujHom chu' vIje'nIS
• Date: Thu, 16 Nov 1995 19:07:31 -0800 (PST)
• cc: Multiple recipients of list <[email protected]>
• In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

Thu, 16 Nov 1995, ghItlh tlheghmeQ:

> [Whew!] jIjegh! qab ghunchu'wI ghu' law' qab ghu'wIj puS.

> (I hope I did that right. It's supposed to be: I give up! {ghunchu'wI}'s 
> situation is worse than mine.)

In law'/puS constructions, the quality being compared follows the noun:
ghunchu'wI' ghu' qab law' ghu'wIj qab puS.

> tlheghmeQ

yoDtargh

• References:
  • Re: DujHom chu' vIje'nIS
    • From: "Elizabeth C. Hoyt" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: TLHINGAN-HOL digest 289
• Next by Date: Re: if, then...
• Prev by thread: Re: DujHom chu' vIje'nIS
• Next by thread: DujHom chu' vIje'nIS
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level