tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Nov 16 08:46:54 1995
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: Angry Klingon reply... <grin>
- From: Jarno Peschier <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: Angry Klingon reply... <grin>
- Date: Thu, 16 Nov 1995 17:48:13 -0100
At 19:11 15-11-95 -0800, you wrote:
>Jarno Peschier writes:
>>...bIghItlh SIbI' 'e' yImev, Qovpatlh Dogh...
>>As far as I understand now, {'e'} references back to the whole sentence
>>{bIghitlh} in the sentence {SIbI' 'e' yImev [name calling]} that follows.
>>Here {'e'} is the object and {SIbI'} is an adverbial that, as TKD says,
>>should be at the beginning of the sentence.
>>Am I right? (I'm still just a beginnner...)
>
>majQa'! Exactly right. yIHem, taghwI' -- Qatlh qechvam.
choHoy'mo' jIHembej. qatlho'.
Jarno Peschier, [email protected], 2:2802/245.1@Fido
162:100/100.1@Agora, 74:3108/102.1@QuaZie, 27:2331/214.1@SigNet
___________________________________________________________________________
What was was, before was was was? Before was was was, was was is.