tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Nov 16 08:46:52 1995

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: TLHINGAN-HOL digest 289



At 19:17 15-11-95 -0800, you wrote:

>> wej Dochvetlh vISovbe'; pongmeyvetlh vIleghbe'pu'...
>> 
>> [Damn, replying in Klingon while you have to look almost every word up in
>> TKD takes *ages*! Ehh... how am I doing, for a beginner...?]
>
>You're doing fine.  When I was a beginner, it also took me hours to look 
>up every word to read the Klingon posts.

Well, for that I've written myself a program. It interprets individual
Klingon words. It helps *a lot*. But when writing something in Klingon
myself I have to start looking u almost every word.

>Eventually, I forced myself to 
>memorize the words so I wouldn't have to keep looking them up.

I start to memorize some words (or at least recognising them) already. It
just takes (a lot of) practise.

>Once I 
>began to recognize the more common words, Klingon became a lot easier.

That's right. As I'm beginning to recognize some more common things, Klingon
really gets to start looking easier. An example: I never really got hold of
the concept of using 'e' by just reading TKD. Now that I see 'e' used on
this list quite a lot of times (often with translations in English) it
suddenly started to fall together like pieces of a puzzle. And that's nice.

>The 
>first time I read an entire Klingon sentence without opening my TKD, I was 
>very excited.

Yes, I know!

>Just keep practicing!

luq. tul chonob 'e' qatlho'.   ;-)
(I hope {tul} is also a noun...?)

          Jarno Peschier, [email protected], 2:2802/245.1@Fido
      162:100/100.1@Agora, 74:3108/102.1@QuaZie, 27:2331/214.1@SigNet
___________________________________________________________________________
     What was was, before was was was? Before was was was, was was is.



Back to archive top level