tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Nov 15 07:44:04 1995
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Angry Klingon reply... <grin>
- From: Jarno Peschier <[email protected]>
- Subject: Angry Klingon reply... <grin>
- Date: Wed, 15 Nov 1995 16:45:21 -0100
At 06:57 15-11-95 -0800, you wrote:
>STOP IT GOD DAMN IT. I'VE ASKED YOU NINE THOUSAND TIMES TO UNSUBSCRIBE ME
>NOW WOULD YOU FUCKING DO IT BEFORE I DRIVE OUT TO FUCKING FLORIDA AND THROW
>YOUR SERVER INTO THE ATLANTIC!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
nuq vIlaDtaH jay'?
bIghItlh SIbI' 'e' yImev, Qovpatlh Dogh.
HutSanIDlogh bIQaghba'pu'...
[Boy, do I like Klingon! <grin>]
And a question on the side: is the second sentence correct?
Or should {SIbI'} and {'e'} be reversed?
As far as I understand now, {'e'} references back to the whole sentence
{bIghitlh} in the sentence {SIbI' 'e' yImev [name calling]} that follows.
Here {'e'} is the object and {SIbI'} is an adverbial that, as TKD says,
should be at the beginning of the sentence.
Am I right? (I'm still just a beginnner...)
Jarno Peschier, [email protected], 2:2802/245.1@Fido
162:100/100.1@Agora, 74:3108/102.1@QuaZie, 27:2331/214.1@SigNet
___________________________________________________________________________
What was was, before was was was? Before was was was, was was is.