tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Nov 13 20:17:42 1995

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: TLHINGAN-HOL digest 294

• From: "Matt Treyvaud, P.A." <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: TLHINGAN-HOL digest 294
• Date: Tue, 14 Nov 1995 15:17:34 +1100 (EDT)
• In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

> >>yu'ghachwIj:
> 
> >{-ghach} Dalo'qu'taH.  jaS mu'lIj Da'oghnIS.  nuqDaq wot tu'lu'?

mu'tlheghvam ghitlhlu'meH tera'ngan lo'lu'taHvIS, wot lo'be'lu'. "My 
questions:" chaq "are" jIlo'nIS. "bIH yu'ghachwIj:" :)

> chaq "jIyu':" neH ghItlhlaH.

mu'tlheghvetlh jIparHa'... "object" poQbe'a' "yu'"? "HeSwI' vIyu'pu', la'" 
vIjatlhmeH vIlo'. 

And I'm not really sure about that sort of structure, either. Since 
tlhIngan goes object-verb-subject, if we do use something like "jIyu'", 
shouldn't it be like:

<block of text>
 ...jIyu'.

?

(I know we had this debate about 'ghItlh' etc. but... it worries me anyway.)

    C /\ T  
   F /()\ C  ...Hoch yItem
  C /____\    ...http://ariel.its.unimelb.edu.au/~cthulhu
    GANTA

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: TLHINGAN-HOL digest 294
    • From: "Mark E. Shoulson" <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: jIlIH(')egh, etc.
    • From: [email protected] ( "c.j.atherton-cj")

• Prev by Date: Re: The KLI's pIqaD
• Next by Date: DS9 Alert!!!
• Prev by thread: Re: jIlIH(')egh, etc.
• Next by thread: Re: TLHINGAN-HOL digest 294
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level