tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Nov 07 14:59:12 1995
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: Languages
- From: Adam Walker <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: Languages
- Date: Tue, 7 Nov 95 16:55:50 -0600
- Organization: Dallas Baptist University
> Date sent: 7-Nov-95 15:34:51 -0600
> From: SHOULSON @ INTERNET (Mark E. Shoulson) {[email protected]}
> To: TLHINGAN @ INTERNET (Multiple recipients of list) {[email protected]}
> Send reply to: TLHINGAN @ INTERNET {[email protected]}
> Subject: Re: Languages
> >Date: Tue, 7 Nov 1995 11:05:53 -0800
> >From: Jarno Peschier <[email protected]>
>
> >At 20:11 5-11-95 -0800, you wrote:
>
> >>>Thanks for the reply. Languages are very interesting, are they not?
> >>
> >> I find them fascinating and have done so since I was introduced to
> >>their existence at the age of seven. I would be willing to bet that most
> >>serious tlhIngan learners have studied other languages before this, perhaps
> >>several. How many, for example studied Esperanto at some time before
> >>tlhIngan? I know from his notes that David Barron has and I first did some
> >>decades back.
>
> I also studied Esperanto before Klingon. And about half-a-dozen other
> constructed languages here and there... I am not a student of obscure and
> constructed languages. I am *the* student of obscure and constructed
> languages. :) I suppose what counts as "obscure" is a matter of opinion,
> of course.
>
> ~mark
>
I am also VERY interested in languages. Which "obscure" languages
have you at least dabbled in? Which constructed ones? I wonder,
does anyone know anything about Klingon Sign Language?