tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu May 25 10:23:03 1995

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: -Daq on numbers



>Date: Wed, 24 May 1995 15:28:34 -0400
>Originator: [email protected]
>From: [email protected]

>I just realized that I may be in error.  Qu'vatlh!
>I know the type 5 marker goes on a following verb (adjective),
>but what about a number?  What about an ordinal number?

><lupDujHomDaq loSvatlh Soch jIH> or 
><lupDujHom loSvatlh SochDaq jIH>?

><lupDujHomDaq cha'DIch jIH> or
><lupDujHom cha'DIchDaq jIH>

>My gut tells me that because these are acting as adjectives,
>they will be treated like adjectival verbs; but I hope not.  It
>looks messy.  Oh well....

My gut seems to agree with your gut, liking lupDujHom cha'DIchDaq (assuming
you're using ordinals and not following cardinals).  I don't see anything
particularly messy about it, though.

>Brad

~mark


Back to archive top level