tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed May 24 14:27:22 1995

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: -Daq on numbers

• From: [email protected]
• Subject: Re: -Daq on numbers
• Date: Wed, 24 May 1995 17:24:12 -0400

> <lupDujHomDaq loSvatlh Soch jIH> or 
> <lupDujHom loSvatlh SochDaq jIH>?
>
> <lupDujHomDaq cha'DIch jIH> or
> <lupDujHom cha'DIchDaq jIH>

I feel from extended perusal of TKD and attempted usage of the Klingon
language to favor:

lupDujHom loSvatlh SochDaq jIHtaH
and
lupDujHom cha'DIchDaq jIHtaH

In particular I refer to TKD 4.4.

Notice that I have added -taH to express the continuous act of being "at" a
place.  If, on the other hand, you were attempting to have a computer state
that "I am shuttlecraft number 407," I would present:

lupDujHom loSvatlh Soch jIH
without either -Daq or -taH

peHruS

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: -Daq on numbers
    • From: "Mark E. Shoulson" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: -Daq on numbers
• Next by Date: Neighboring villages
• Prev by thread: Re: -Daq on numbers
• Next by thread: Re: -Daq on numbers
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level