tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri May 19 14:25:59 1995

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: jImawqu'wI' (was: Re: young Klingons)



According to Steve Weaver:
> 
> Thu, 18 May 1995 20:41:45 ghItlhta' David Barron:
... 
> >THIS IS A PERFECT EXAMPLE OF WHAT IS MEANT TO  GET OFF TOPIC!
> >
> >tlhIngan Hol, tlhIngan Hol, tlhIngan Hol wIneH jay'!
> bIlughbejtaH. tlhIngan Hol vIghItlhmoHta'.

"I have accomplished causing Klingon Language to write."?

> jImawqu'wI'. 

wejquH. {mawqu'wI' jIH} DaHech pagh {jImawqu'pu'} DaHech. You
don't want to put a verb prefix and a nominalizing suffix on
the same verb root at the same time.

> SatlhIjqu'bej jIH vInoblI'. 

nuqjatlh? wa' mu'tlheghDaq wuvbe'chuqbogh cha' wot Dalo'pu'.

> tlhIngan Hol tlhIH bojatlh boghItlh 'ej law' tlhIngan Hol jIH
> vIjatlh vIghItlh 'ej puS. 

nuqjatlh?

> jInIDqu'taH

qaHar. bInIDtaH. manIDnIStaH Hoch.

> nganpu':
> naDHa'ghachwI' vIghuHqu'rup

potlhqu' naDHa'ghach. ramqu' QaghlIj. nInaDHa' neHchugh vay'
vaj qaHub.

charghwI'

--
 \___
 o_/ \
 <\__,\
  ">   | Get a grip.
   `   |


Back to archive top level