tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed May 03 17:29:06 1995
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: KLBC: Comparatives
On Tue, 2 May 1995, Marc Ruehlaender wrote:
> > > I don't have an example at hand, but consider the case it
> > > makes a difference whether both SOCs refer to the main
> > > clause or whether (SOC1 MC) functions as MC to SOC2.
> > > How would these two be distinguished?
> >
> > The follow text appears on Skybox Trading Card SP1. The card is entitled
> > {Qo'noS wo'} and it talks about the symbol of the Klingon Empire. The
> > third sentence is an example of a sentence with three subordinate clauses.
> >
> phew! I'll try to translate this before I go on...
[Translation deleted]
majQa'. mu'tlheghvetlh Damughchu'ta'.
> Hmm... must have gone something wrong :(
> At least I don't see how this answers my question...
> Or do you want to say you join SOCs with the same
> MC by conjunctions, while those which are not
> joined belong to different tiers?
Give me an example of the type of sentence you are referring to.
I couldn't think of a good example.
> Marc Doychlangan
yoDtargh