tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon May 01 10:41:27 1995
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: ruSghep (was peH)
- From: "Mark E. Shoulson" <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: ruSghep (was peH)
- Date: Mon, 1 May 1995 13:41:26 -0400
- In-Reply-To: <[email protected]> (message from Jeremy Cowan on Sat, 29 Apr 1995 00:53:59 -0400)
>Date: Sat, 29 Apr 1995 00:53:59 -0400
>Originator: [email protected]
>From: Jeremy Cowan <[email protected]>
>On Fri, 28 Apr 1995 [email protected] wrote:
>> Form textual analysis I now discern that <ghep> = "age," taken from the
>> two samples available, which are <peHghep> and <ruSghep>. I now go to
>> two more samples, <ruSghep> and <ruStay>, to discern that <ruS> =
>> "bonding."
>I can't claim to be even near beginning my annotated dictionary, but in
>all my various notes on the language, I can't find ruSghep. Have I
>missed this somewhere? Please list the source.
I can't find it either. Are you sure you're not using a word you yourself
used once as evidence by mistake, peHruS?
>janSIy
~mark