tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Mar 07 07:25:50 1995

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: A thought

• From: "Mark E. Shoulson" <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: A thought
• Date: Tue, 7 Mar 1995 10:25:47 -0500
• In-Reply-To: <[email protected]> ([email protected])

>Date: Tue, 7 Mar 1995 09:20:03 -0500
>Originator: [email protected]
>From: [email protected] (Bill Willmerdinger)

>muparHa' pagh; mumuS Hoch; gharghmey vISop 'e' qatlh vIruchQo'.

I'd reverse "'e'" and "qatlh".  "'e'" is the object of the sentence, after
all, and adverbials come before the object.  Should be "qatlh 'e'
vIruchQo'?"

~mark

• References:
  • A thought
    • From: [email protected] (Bill Willmerdinger)

• Prev by Date: Re: E pluribus unum: $0.02-wIj
• Next by Date: Re: A thought
• Prev by thread: A thought
• Next by thread: Re: A thought
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level