tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sun Jul 30 15:23:46 1995

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: }}} KLBC: wamwI'

• From: [email protected] (Alan Anderson)
• Subject: Re: }}} KLBC: wamwI'
• Date: Sun, 30 Jul 1995 14:23:46 -0500

 Marc 'Dochlangan' writes:
>.. All I asked was, if it was allowed
>to expand from 'lo'laH X = X can be used' to other verbs
>and if not so, why?

I do not believe we can deduce a general rule from a single example.
All the evidence I have says that {XlaH} means only "able to X" with
{lo'laH} "be useful" as an irregular exception.

-- ghunchu'wI'

• Prev by Date: Re: }}} KSRP (was KBTP)
• Next by Date: Re: }}} Dialects (was: Klingon paintball)
• Prev by thread: Re: }}} KLBC: wamwI'
• Next by thread: Re: }}} KBTP
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level