tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Jan 04 14:03:49 1995
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: any lexicographers?
>Date: Tue, 3 Jan 1995 18:37:12 -0500
>Originator: [email protected]
>From: "Mark E. Shoulson" <[email protected]>
>>Date: Tue, 3 Jan 1995 01:16:13 -0500
>>Originator: [email protected]
>>From: [email protected]
>>po'bogh mu'tay'wI'
>Either your vocabulary is sentient or you're compounding with verbs or
>you're putting verb-suffixes on nouns. Huh?
DopDaq qul yIchenmoH QobDI' ghu'. Obviously, this could be a legit
compound of "mu'" + "tay'wI'", but "be-ers together of words" is *also* not
really informative. I hope you're not *gasp* calquing by sticking the
verb-suffix -wI' onto the noun "vocabulary" for "vocabulary-ers".
>>ghuy'Do
>~mark
~mark