tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Dec 29 13:50:34 1995

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: make sense?

• From: "William H. Martin" <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: make sense?
• Date: Fri, 29 Dec 1995 16:50:24 -0500 (EST)
• In-Reply-To: <[email protected]> from "Clint S. Moore" at Dec 27, 95 11:29:47 pm

According to Clint S. Moore:
> 
> neH tlhIngan QeHvIpbe'choH qoHna'
> 
> Does this make sense to anybody?

ghobe'.

> I'm trying for "only a fool would anger a Klingon"

You need to go back and read TKD again about {neH}. It follows
the noun it modifies.

You also need to consider the suffix {-moH}. Otherwise, you
have no way to give "be angry" an object. You don't "be angry"
a Klingon. You CAUSE a Klingon to be angry.

Meanwhile, that's good use of {-na'} and your sentence is very
nearly done. Keep at it.

> Qapla'
> 
> 

charghwI'
-- 

 \___
 o_/ \
 <\__,\
  ">   | Get a grip.
   `   |

• References:
  • make sense?
    • From: [email protected] (Clint S. Moore)

• Prev by Date: Re: After Doing vs. When Done
• Next by Date: Re: Calendar Ideas
• Prev by thread: make sense?
• Next by thread: Re: make sense?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level