tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Dec 21 20:52:16 1995

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: leSpoHwIj yIghuH

• From: [email protected]
• Subject: Re: leSpoHwIj yIghuH
• Date: Thu, 21 Dec 1995 23:51:45 -0500

Hu'tegh
jIQIpqu'

Of course, TKD p170 has the entry {bIjeghbe'chugh vaj bIHegh}.  Naturally,
neither pronomial prefix indicates an Object.  The secondary clause does not
act as a standalone sentence, as does the secondary clause of a sentence
ending with {'e' + verb}.

HIvqa' veqlargh

Bang head here.

peHruS

• Prev by Date: You see why I'm worried!
• Next by Date: Re: KLBC: -DI' useage
• Prev by thread: Re: leSpoHwIj yIghuH
• Next by thread: Christmas break
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level