tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Dec 13 15:58:54 1995

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: "bang"

• From: [email protected] (Alan Anderson)
• Subject: Re: "bang"
• Date: Wed, 13 Dec 1995 18:59:31 -0500

Dotlh:
>|*HIja'*      *Hovmey*      *vIbang*|
>|*Yes* *I* *do* *love* *the* *stars*|

marqem:
>I'd say <vIparHa'qu'>.

I'd say {bIH vIbej 'e' vItIvqu'} or {mubelqu' bIH}.
It all depends on what "love" really means here.

But is {parHa'qu'} grammatical?  May we put one rover suffix
immediately after another?  I don't like the way it looks.

-- ghunchu'wI'               batlh Suvchugh vaj batlh SovchoH vaj

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: "bang"
    • From: "R.B Franklin" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: KLBC: Win 95 "Klingon-ized"
• Next by Date: Re: [What, me worry?]
• Prev by thread: "bang"
• Next by thread: Re: "bang"
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level