tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Dec 13 11:11:39 1995

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: KLBC: Federation Pronunciation



> Date sent:      11-Dec-95 22:00:17 -0600
> From:           RANDALL2 @ INTERNET (R.B Franklin) {[email protected]}
> To:             TLHINGAN @ INTERNET (Multiple recipients of list) {[email protected]}
> Send reply to:  TLHINGAN @ INTERNET {[email protected]}
> Subject:        Re: KLBC: Federation Pronunciation

> 
> On Fri, 8 Dec 1995, Adam Walker wrote:
> 
> > If you're a native speaker of English you have the other "L" too.  
> > English has both of them conviniently packaged in one word "little."
> > Try saying it out loud listen carefully and pay attention to your 
> > tongue placement.
> 
> I've often read about the two different /l/ sounds in English, but I've 
> never been able to make the distinction.  My /l/ seems to be articulated 
> the same for both sounds in "little", in fact, when I say the word 
> rapidly, my tongue lowers slightly for the /I/ vowel and repositions 
> itself on the alveolar ridge to make the  /tl/ in the same manner as the 
> initial /l/ was made. (I vocalize the final /l/ as a syllabic consonant.)
> When I say "little", I use an alveolar tap with the tip of my tongue to make 
> the /t/, which is not the way I articulate an initial  /t/ as in "tap", 
> which I articulate by flattening a wider portion of my tongue against the 
> alevolar ridge.
> 
> When I make an /l/ only the tip of my tongue touches the alveolar ridge.
> Is the other /l/ sound you're referring to made by relaxing the tongue 
> and pressing a wider portion of it against the alveolar ridge?
> 
> > Qogh
> 
> yoDtargh
> 
>
No the difference is in the position of the body of the tongue not 
the tip.  The sylabic consonant you refer to is the dark "L".  I 
would be truely surprised if you pronounce the first one as a "dark 
L".  The first "l" should be the "clear" sound.

Qapla'

Qogh.
 




Back to archive top level