tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Dec 04 18:49:23 1995

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: KLBC - hello and questions

• From: "R.B Franklin" <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: KLBC - hello and questions
• Date: Mon, 4 Dec 1995 18:47:34 -0800 (PST)
• cc: Multiple recipients of list <[email protected]>
• In-Reply-To: <v01520d00ace8286e6e42@[205.139.170.201]>

On Sun, 3 Dec 1995, Alan Anderson wrote:

> But you recently pointed out that {rIn} probably isn't transitive, so
> {... 'e' vIrIn} doesn't make grammatical sense.  You suggested making
> it {rInmoH}; I think {mev} works.  Or {jIjatlh DaH 'e' vImev rIntaH},
> to get across the "finished" idea.  Oops, I'm getting unnecessarily
> complex for a note with "KLBC" in the subject.

bIqar.  HIvqa' veqlargh

> -- ghunchu'wI'               batlh Suvchugh vaj batlh SovchoH vaj

yoDtargh

• References:
  • Re: KLBC - hello and questions
    • From: [email protected] (Alan Anderson)

• Prev by Date: Re: intransitive verbs
• Next by Date: Re: chuS'ugh
• Prev by thread: Re: KLBC - hello and questions
• Next by thread: Re: KLBC - hello and questions
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level