tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sun Dec 03 22:05:30 1995

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: Translation request (clich'e)

• From: [email protected]
• Subject: Re: Translation request (clich'e)
• Date: Mon, 4 Dec 1995 01:04:59 -0500

In a message dated 95-11-29 19:13:39 EST, you write:

>tlhIngan Duj 'oHchugh Dujvam Dochvam chotlhobta'mo' SIbI' qaHoHbej.
>
>

Almost:  add the Type 5 Noun Suffix to the Subject of an Equivalency Clause.
 tlhIngan Duj 'oHchugh Dujvam'e'
and I like (personally) to use {vaj} after the {-chugh} clause:  vaj Dochvam
chotlhobmo' SIbI' qaHoHbej

Okay.  Why did I drop {-ta'} from {chotlhobta'mo'}.  That's just a feeling I
have regarding Type 7 Aspect suffixes.

peHruS

• Prev by Date: Re: qeylIS betleH
• Next by Date: Re: Colors? What colors?
• Prev by thread: Re: Translation request (clich'e)
• Next by thread: Re: Translation request (clich'e)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level