tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Sep 08 06:10:52 1994
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL21]
>From: [email protected] (David Barron)
>Date: Thu, 8 Sep 1994 12:20:12 -0600 (MDT)
[charghwI' writes:]
>>jIH lugh law' SoH lugh puS qar'a'?
> majQa'!
Except that I, at least, have my doubts about how to construct law'/puS
sentences with pronouns as subjects. Somehow "jIH lugh" just looks wrong.
Granted, absent any evidence, it's the closest thing we have to conforming
to TKD, but I don't think it's all that close. I wonder about things like
"?jIlugh law' bIlugh puS" or even "?lughwIj law' lughlIj puS." No, I'm not
recommending these, but the ideas were kicked around. I think this was on
the list of Okrand questions ages back.
> >charghwI'
~mark