tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Mar 14 09:53:27 1994
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: KLBC- puqbe'pu?
- From: trI'Qal <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: KLBC- puqbe'pu?
- Date: Mon, 14 Mar 1994 22:50:39 -0400 (EDT)
majIqvo':
>> puqbe' = daughter
>
>AH! noun-noun construction... haven't got that far yet.. but.. jIyaj!
Actually, no. It may very well have derived from a noun-noun construction,
but the word is a seperate entry in the dictionary itself. Noun-noun
constructions are two seperate words. This would be more accurately described
as a compound noun. Any further discussion on this probably shouldn't be
under the KLBC heading. {{:)
--HoD trI'Qal