tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Jul 28 11:11:19 1994
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: Great Signature
- From: [email protected] (Nick NICHOLAS)
- Subject: Re: Great Signature
- Date: Fri, 29 Jul 1994 13:05:00 +1000 (EST)
- In-Reply-To: <[email protected]> from "William H. Martin" at Jul 28, 94 10:43:44 pm
Hu'tegh! nuq ja' William H. Martin jay'?
=> 'oy''a' DaSIQmeH pISughpu'. DaSIQlaHbe'law' bIpujqu'mo'. vaj bIqej.
=> A bit more literal, and even a bit simpler syntactically, but maybe overlong?
=I certainly like your word choice better. While I usually tend
=to advocate this kind of multi-sentence stuff, just for the
=hell of it, how do you like:
=patlhlIj 'oy' DaSIQlaHbe'law'mo' bIqej.
I like it a lot. majQa'!
--
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>.<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
Nick Nicholas. Linguistics, University of Melbourne. [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
AND MOVING SOON TO: [email protected]