tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Jul 08 03:02:25 1994
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: DaqDaq?
On Thu, 7 Jul 1994, jatlh William H. Martin:
> According to Bill Willmerdinger\:
> ...
> > This is a case where I felt it better to ask. I was concerned whether QongDa
> q
> > was a complex noun, or a noun+locative suffix. Now that I think about it, it
> > is obviously the former, and also Qong is then a verb AND a noun.
>
> Sorry. You can't presume that yet. Until Okrand explicitly says
> that Qong is both noun and verb, it is just a verb. Just
> because he makes a new noun for "bed" and calls it {QongDaq}
> does NOT mean that you can infer that {Qong} is a noun.
Okrand tlhoblu'laH'a'?
Why don't we just ASK him?
----------------------
chuQun