tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Jul 07 05:12:28 1994
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: DaqDaq?
- From: "William H. Martin" <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: DaqDaq?
- Date: Thu, 7 Jul 94 17:08:58 EDT
- In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>; from "Bill Willmerdinger\" at Jul 5, 94 8:17 pm
According to Bill Willmerdinger\:
...
> This is a case where I felt it better to ask. I was concerned whether QongDaq
> was a complex noun, or a noun+locative suffix. Now that I think about it, it
> is obviously the former, and also Qong is then a verb AND a noun.
Sorry. You can't presume that yet. Until Okrand explicitly says
that Qong is both noun and verb, it is just a verb. Just
because he makes a new noun for "bed" and calls it {QongDaq}
does NOT mean that you can infer that {Qong} is a noun.
charghwI'