tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sun Aug 28 10:57:35 1994

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: open can of worms



Guidovo':
> Plus, all this thinking about {-oy} lead me to realize that {-oy} is the only
> morpheme that would cause phonological ambiguity. E.g., is {ghu'oy} {ghu +
> (')oy} or {ghu' + oy}? Tho I can't fathom under what circumstances one might
> find chance to use the latter.


I believe the KD says specifically that if the -oy suffix follows a word 
that ends in a noun, an ' is stuck in there between them.  Yes, this 
means that ?ghuoy? and <ghu'oy'> are now pronounced the same, and context 
is required to see which is intended.  In fact, that might even be the 
example used... *checkse KD*  Nope, no example given, but it *soes* say 
that a ' is put in.  Read page 174.


--tQ


-- 
HaghtaHbogh tlhIngan yIvoqQo'!  toH, qatlh reH HaghtaH HoD Qanqor...?

--HoD trI'Qal		Captain T'rkal		---------------------
  tlhwD lIy So'		IKV Hidden Comet	|   [email protected]







Back to archive top level