tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Apr 28 14:55:12 1994
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: oops
ghItlh charghwI':
>> Yes. I think it must have been {'ach HoD, Hevetlh wIghoSchugh veH tIn
wI'el
>> maH'e'}. That wasn't too bad considering some of the other grammatical
>> corruptions. I don't know why he didn't use {je} after {wI'el} to carry
>> across the sense of "as well".
> So maybe the {maH'e'} was supposed to be {maH je}?
ghobe' - [TKD 5.3] yIlaD - wot'e' tlha'nIS <je>
Guido#1, Leader of All Guidos