tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Sep 17 09:29:03 1993

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Fractions (was: Re: Between)



jatlh HoD Qanqor:
[quote from ~mark]
: Well, I'm not so sure about generalizing -vI'.  Not the least bit
: sure.  However, I do not feel that, lacking such a suffix, that we
: are wholly without the ability to do fractions.  Were I to need a
: fraction, I would use DoD.  Perhaps I am dealing from ignorance, but
: isn't the "mark" in "course 111 mark 14" the same as a decimal
: point?  A decimal point lets us do a vast wealth of fractions.
There are numerous (hypothetical) ways to do fractions; 3/5 could be >wej
vaghDaq<, or (based somewhat on Japanese) >wej vagh'ay'<, or, as ~mark
suggests, >wej vaghvi'(mey?)<, or >pagh DoD jav<, or >wej vagh wavghachmey<, or
even >vagh wej wavghachmey<! Given time, I suppose I could think up some more.
I guess what we need to do here is figure out how Klingons would likely do
fractions themselves, and looked at from that perspective, though I _really_
don't want to get into unsanctioned affixes (especially not on the basis of a
word or two -- tlhH is very irregular in that respect), using a suffix for a
fraction seems very Klingon. If we go with that, I propose >-vi'< or even
(*barf, barf*) >wav<.

: 
: Extra credit (10 points):  Identify course 111.14.
: 
nuqjatlh jay'?

:                     --Krankor
: 
: 

Qapla' Qichqengwi'vo'.
-- 
===============================================================================
 _  _ _   _ _     _ _    _  _ _   _  _ _     _ _   _  _ _   |    Marnen E.
| |/ \ \ / \ \   / \ \  | |/ \_\ | |/ \ \   / \_\ | |/ \ \  |   Laibow-Koser
| |   | |   | | | | | | | |      | |   | | | |/   | |   | | |   laibow@brick.
|_|   |_|   |_|  \_\|_| |_|      |_|   |_|  \_\_/ |_|   |_| |   purchase.edu
                                                            |   SUNY Purchase
===============================================================================



Back to archive top level