tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Sep 15 23:56:21 1993

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: tun moQmaj




>> baHwI' QaQ wItu'pu'mo' chaq Quj wIQappu'

>     wItu'pu'mo'?

>     Verb prefix - verb - verb suffix - NOUN suffix.

>     I don't think that works.

Well, it *wouldn't* work, if that analysis were accurate.  But I
suggest you try rereading page 175.  tsk, charghwI', you know better
than that.  {{:-)

                    --Krankor



Back to archive top level