tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Mar 22 15:28:02 2011
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: KTH - vI'angta''a'?
- From: MorphemeAddict <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: KTH - vI'angta''a'?
- Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 18:22:33 -0400
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=Kn8cmKj2ZVuUHuJbTQqQAzLdKtJ1YMkJmw5JLnNtWLk=; b=tEAk1txR5TluStqJJ563QPiZmiSnsnGxp0NFBD2UZzuc8E1JxSZxVSQsO9iX10Ur0l DDYxhkZEtt09m7+oY1Q/yfGLYnca7yXcElakNlpdoozAygq4mO/U8Iq8NX10Ik+vrEO1 j3RPg43H/9wvSje/nTUFQJ7PDPIQeqjrCdI/g=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=QO1hgH/GeY/Bht1UBJT/T6Zt7aCSK6mzubet4SR3qAkEdua55fIvki2VtE/EXeJxxC zlptbHvaVEMwhoUsnoiKp7j6xhCjiV63gEuJpYBnmK5iKV+2yZtZUyTw1UxwBr5TxG1H uHofAT9576aynLtVC/hxv9twCu5ijKReQOlVE=
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <[email protected]>
qatlh <Javascript> Dalo'Qo'?
lay'tel SIvten
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 4:36 PM, Christoph Pichlmann <
[email protected]> wrote:
> >Felix Malmenbeck
> >HoD: qatlh choQ loSDaq tlhuHlaHbe' beq?
> >yaS: muD ngeb SeHwI' patDaq qagh tu'lu'!
> >HoD: *Qagh* Dajatlh 'e' DaHech.
> >yaS: ghobe'. *qagh*.
> majQa'.
> Took me a while to figure it out. Neat. (Did I mention I need to learn more
> vocabulary? Sadly, the word "tlhuHlaHbe' " demonstrates one of the
> shortcomings of the interface.)
>
> >> vuDmey tIja'.
> >vIparHa'. lo'laHlaw'.
> jIQuch.
>
> >I think it would be nice if you didn't have to hold the mouse down to view
> the words. People may want to move the cursor over to the text on the left
> in order to copy it,
> >and I personally do a lot of my work using a touchpad rather than a mouse.
> Hm.
> KTH yIn wa'DIch, bI'uchnISbe'. much ngo' QaghmoH, vIchoH. much chu' pIm.
> QaghmoHbe'.
> vIchoHqa'. KTH vIje'. DaH DawIvlaH.
>
> (Not sure if this is understandable. This is what I wanted to say:
> At first you didn't have to hold (the mouse). Because of the way it was
> displayed, this caused problems. So I changed it. The new display doesn't
> have that problem, so I changed it again. I improved it. Now you can choose.
> (I added an option at the start screen. Choose what fits best for you.)
>
> For the actual explanation:
> At first there was no fancy interface, just an HTML file that contained the
> text. The "translation" would be shown where the word is. So if you scroll
> across it, you'd constantly see text flashing, which I consider very
> annoying. Also, some versions of IE have horrible perfomance with the way
> the text is hidden/shown.
>
> Now that there is the web interface with a separate window for the
> information, the only problem remaining (old) IE. QaghtaH...?)
>
> vISov: "JavaScript" lo'lu'mo' DaqIpta'. 'ach, "JavaScript" vIlo'Qo' -
> batlhwIj poQ! "CSS" woQ yIlegh! Do'Ha', 'oHbe' woQ'a'...
> (I know, with JS it would be possible to just click(hit) it. But my honor
> demands that I do not use Javascript. Behold the power of CSS.
> Unfortunately, not the ultimate power...
> Seriously, I prefer not to use JS. I know nowadays all browsers understand
> standard JS, but I prefer to do without it. CSS today is powerful enough for
> most tasks. It is not the ultimate solution, unfortunately.)
>
>
>
> vIDubtaH. vay' chup?
>
> (I'll continue to improve it. Any suggestions?)
>
> Christoph
>
>