tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Jul 22 04:24:02 2011

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Context

lojmIt tI'wI'nuv ([email protected])

• From: lojmIt tI'wI'nuv <[email protected]>
• Subject: Context
• Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 07:22:13 -0400
• Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:from:content-type:x-mailer:message-id:date:to :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=6K8RkYpEdi60HZxiUP9fI6ZJmXyd/iE2/HxeRNVxEbA=; b=Q529LJP/QT1mB6Q3WJ+CWoVXiBhxOoEluMAqt/YQ3ZyR3mr1pjeVZMOTWBYkcI2ncj GhBbJ/1o9pxpluY0laS5gwIC8qDHWbtpVG+8jXQANiBud+LWRSaj6C8/vp7GJbbLJS9R 9o9Jtl0G5KXWHc4JDeh3Tegm5NPzslhNQ/h50=

Given how often Okrand has explained that aspects of the language requires context to comprehend detail, it is ironic that he has not given us a word for "context".

lojmit tI'wI'nuv

Sent from my iPod

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Context
    • From: Steven Boozer <[email protected]>
  • Re: Context
    • From: Terrence Donnelly <[email protected]>
  • Re: Context
    • From: "ghunchu'wI' 'utlh" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: qepHom-reminder
• Next by Date: RE: Context
• Previous by thread: qepHom-reminder
• Next by thread: RE: Context
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level