tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Jan 21 13:57:52 2011

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: nom qetwI'

Lieven Litaer ([email protected])

• From: Lieven Litaer <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: nom qetwI'
• Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 22:55:37 +0100
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
• References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <C305E6BD33E2654DAE1F8F403247B6A6021A7C29B386@EVS02.ad.uchicago.edu> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; de; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7

ja' ghunchu'wI':
> It was thought of, thoroughly discussed, and dismissed. I was on the
> "it works for me" side for a while, but I eventually realized it only
> worked for me when *I* said it. When someone else tries it, it doesn't
> work for me at all.

That's what I thought. It's probably an internal brain error translating 
and adverb as an adjective: nom qetwI' is more like a quickly runner 
[sic], not a quick runner.

you convinced me, an I convinced myelf. it was just a thought :-)

DaH yIvumqa'.

Quvar.

• References:
  • nom qetwI'
    • From: Lieven Litaer <[email protected]>
  • Re: nom qetwI'
    • From: "ghunchu'wI' 'utlh" <[email protected]>
  • Re: nom qetwI'
    • From: "lojmIt tI'wI' nuv" <[email protected]>
  • RE: nom qetwI'
    • From: Steven Boozer <[email protected]>
  • Re: nom qetwI'
    • From: Lieven Litaer <[email protected]>
  • Re: nom qetwI'
    • From: "ghunchu'wI' 'utlh" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: nom qetwI'
• Next by Date: Re: nom qetwI'
• Previous by thread: Re: nom qetwI'
• Next by thread: Re: nom qetwI'
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level