tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Jan 21 11:00:45 2011

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: nom qetwI'

Lieven Litaer ([email protected])

• From: Lieven Litaer <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: nom qetwI'
• Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 19:58:27 +0100
• In-reply-to: <C305E6BD33E2654DAE1F8F403247B6A6021A7C29B386@EVS02.ad.uchicago.edu>
• References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <C305E6BD33E2654DAE1F8F403247B6A6021A7C29B386@EVS02.ad.uchicago.edu>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; de; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7

all of your advices are really nice, but I did not intend to stick to 
this {nom qetbogh loD}.

I thought about an adjectivial use of an adverb. I know, this sounds 
strange. Perhaps it's a concept that nobody thought of, or it just 
doesn't work... ?

Here some examples, that might or might not work:

{nom qetwI' SoH}
"you are a quick runner"

{tlhoy SopwI' ghaH}
"he's a too-much-eater"

{not jeghwI'}
"a never surrenderer"

{pe'vIl tlhutlhwI'}
"forcefully drinker"

Do all of these just work in the pattern
{adverb verb-bogh noun}?

Quvar
aka
   Lieven.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: nom qetwI'
    • From: "ghunchu'wI' 'utlh" <[email protected]>
  • Re: nom qetwI'
    • From: lojmIt tI'wI'nuv <[email protected]>

• References:
  • nom qetwI'
    • From: Lieven Litaer <[email protected]>
  • Re: nom qetwI'
    • From: "ghunchu'wI' 'utlh" <[email protected]>
  • Re: nom qetwI'
    • From: "lojmIt tI'wI' nuv" <[email protected]>
  • RE: nom qetwI'
    • From: Steven Boozer <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: qoqqoqmey - jaj wa'maH cha'
• Next by Date: Re: nom qetwI'
• Previous by thread: Re: nom qetwI'
• Next by thread: Re: nom qetwI'
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level