tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu May 28 00:22:23 2009
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: nuq bach?
- From: Brent Kesler <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: nuq bach?
- Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 00:20:40 -0700
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=McAogtL62EIpXrNnn5J1ctoWDuMQq/pthkTUhFfkbMA=; b=AFh5lWBIRP3z3zMGrJC1LTYMsT7/1fB0ibEoY6YBrHBRwWx3YD7pwZjrDRgUdIybs8 axDIeyKsl3uDhDaxZwI5IIkXQBCF87Hl1pyb7arwwFnoVWh8v+QFyQdwAyrc+x+ZJlEf Xv5W/94sssN/nfI0bpvvP/RC6ZjVsL4ZYO3g8=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=aDyAsoHdxMHjyBJFcNcnWoPwkpL/x1xXjmsZKEWVxj4E7Mg0Tj9UGEGSnMwrcv2Kzh R+y04QACS0Mk3VlR2GvaoOWx1BwpogEhOH/JMUn+gVcBr/808ugWdfofeT0pBbTPxpMI Q0JiMWUMHDpYJai6Hr8znmO/TXTFs87to6Ris=
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 9:26 AM, Steven Boozer <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> If you don't like the latter, you can use {ngu'} and say:
>
> DoSDaq bachchu'bogh yaS yIngu'
> "Identify the target at which the officer shot!")
>
> But since you can't use two Type 5 suffixes - i.e. *{DoSDaq'e'} - this is still ambiguous as it could
> possibly mean "Identify the officer who shot at the target!"
Epiphany: Use {-meH}. It's clean and clear.
'Iv qIpmeH bach yaS?
'Iv HoHmeH bach yaS?
bI'reng