tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Apr 22 22:01:33 2008

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: cha' Hol ngeb mu'ghommey Daj vItu'pu'!

MorphemeAddict ([email protected])

• From: [email protected]
• Subject: Re: cha' Hol ngeb mu'ghommey Daj vItu'pu'!
• Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 01:00:09 EDT

In a message dated 4/22/2008 23:08:28 PM Central Daylight Time, 
[email protected] writes:

> On a more serious note, I'm a little confused as to what context renders 
> my example irrelevant. It can't be the fact that we're discussing 
> compound nouns, since Okrand clearly used English compound nouns to 
> demonstrate the Klingon principle. And it can't be the fact that we're 
> discussing pronunciation, as the majority of examples Okrand uses to 
> demonstrate Klingon pronunciation are English.
> 
> I'm willing to consider that my example might be irrelevant, but so far 
> I'm not convinced.
> 

Using English as an example is fine, as long as it's noted as such.
I didn't see any such indication in the original post.  

lay'tel SIvten   </HTML>

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: cha' Hol ngeb mu'ghommey Daj vItu'pu'!
    • From: Sangqar <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: 3- Play
• Next by Date: Lowest price worldwide
• Previous by thread: Re: cha' Hol ngeb mu'ghommey Daj vItu'pu'!
• Next by thread: Re: cha' Hol ngeb mu'ghommey Daj vItu'pu'!
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level