tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sat Oct 28 10:27:41 2006

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: KLBC: A Failure to Communicate

MorphemeAddict ([email protected])

• From: [email protected]
• Subject: Re: KLBC: A Failure to Communicate
• Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 13:27:18 EDT

In a message dated 10/27/2006 11:22:32 PM Central Standard Time, 
[email protected] writes:

> Is your only reason for shying away from {wanI' ghaj} the fact that  
> it's never been seen in canon?  I'm not that conservative.  There are  
> probably better verbs in such a case -- {SIQ} or {tIv}, perhaps --  
> but {ghaj} does not strike me as wrong.
> 
> -- ghunchu'wI'
> 


I'm not shying away from it.  I just gave the known boundaries of its usage, 
so that others would know when they are entering less explored territory.

lay'tel SIvten

• Prev by Date: Klingon WOTD: mIw (noun)
• Next by Date: WoT
• Previous by thread: Re: KLBC: A Failure to Communicate
• Next by thread: Dilbert Comic in Klingon for 2006/10/17
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level