tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Oct 27 11:56:05 2006

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: KLBC: A Failure to Communicate

MorphemeAddict ([email protected])

• From: [email protected]
• Subject: Re: KLBC: A Failure to Communicate
• Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 14:55:43 EDT

In a message dated 10/27/2006 9:21:30 AM Central Standard Time, 
[email protected] writes:

> AFAIK there are two known examples of {Qum}, neither taking an object:
> 
>    jIQum
>    I communicate. STC:KLS
> 
>    naDev bIQumqa' 'e' vItul.
>    [untranslated] BBS (MO to SuStel 11/96)
> 
> 

Even if we accept that {Qum} can take objects, such objects would probably be 
*what* was communicated, not with whom.  So {-chuq} would still not work.

lay'tel SIvten

• Prev by Date: baQ-'a'
• Next by Date: Re: Klingon WOTD: ngotlh (verb)
• Previous by thread: Re: KLBC: A Failure to Communicate
• Next by thread: Re: KLBC: A Failure to Communicate
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level